{ "schema": "qaeda.public-annotations.v1", "canonical": "https://qaeda.org/annotations", "updated": "2026-09-02", "publication": "Questioning Accepted Ethics, Dogma & Authority", "purpose": "Passage-level provenance notes connecting consequential essay statements to public claims and protected source-dossier identifiers.", "boundary": "Annotations expose relationships and qualifications, not protected dossier bodies. Annotation roles do not replace claim confidence in claims.json.", "annotation_count": 30, "annotations": [ { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-001", "marker": "1", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-002", "article_path": "/articles/sanctity-of-the-query", "passage_anchor": "query-is-not-confession", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/sanctity-of-the-query#query-is-not-confession", "role": "Editorial boundary", "statement": "A lawful query is evidence of inquiry, not by itself a confession of belief, character, or harmful intent.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-013" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-021", "QAEDA-SRC-030" ], "editorial_note": "This is a QAEDA normative presumption. It can be displaced by additional context or conduct; the topic alone is insufficient.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-002", "marker": "2", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-002", "article_path": "/articles/sanctity-of-the-query", "passage_anchor": "inference-sensitive", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/sanctity-of-the-query#inference-sensitive", "role": "Evidence linkage", "statement": "Longitudinal query data becomes more sensitive when combined with identity and behavioral signals.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-011" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-019", "QAEDA-SRC-030", "QAEDA-SRC-031" ], "editorial_note": "The linked claim is supported rather than absolute; sensitivity and inference quality vary by dataset and context.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-003", "marker": "3", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-003", "article_path": "/articles/algorithmic-judgment-of-intent", "passage_anchor": "person-model", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/algorithmic-judgment-of-intent#person-model", "role": "Evidence linkage", "statement": "Request interpretation can become persistent profiling when query context is joined to broader user history.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-011" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-019", "QAEDA-SRC-030" ], "editorial_note": "This note distinguishes immediate relevance inference from durable cross-request person models.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-004", "marker": "4", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-003", "article_path": "/articles/algorithmic-judgment-of-intent", "passage_anchor": "consequential-inference", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/algorithmic-judgment-of-intent#consequential-inference", "role": "Governance inference", "statement": "Consequential ranking, refusal, sanction, or risk classification should expose reasons and meaningful correction paths.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-020" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-019", "QAEDA-SRC-020", "QAEDA-SRC-022" ], "editorial_note": "This is QAEDA’s governance inference from due-process and auditability research; it is not a claim that every ranking decision requires formal adjudication.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-005", "marker": "5", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-004", "article_path": "/articles/curiosity-is-not-intent", "passage_anchor": "study-not-loyalty", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/curiosity-is-not-intent#study-not-loyalty", "role": "Editorial boundary", "statement": "Studying a dangerous or controversial subject does not establish endorsement of it.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-013" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-021", "QAEDA-SRC-033" ], "editorial_note": "The presumption protects journalism, scholarship, prevention, criticism, fiction, and ordinary curiosity while allowing context-sensitive intervention when evidence changes.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-006", "marker": "6", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-004", "article_path": "/articles/curiosity-is-not-intent", "passage_anchor": "capability-layer", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/curiosity-is-not-intent#capability-layer", "role": "Governance inference", "statement": "Safety can often target what an interaction materially enables rather than treating an entire field of knowledge as forbidden.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-016" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-021", "QAEDA-SRC-033" ], "editorial_note": "The linked position rejects both unrestricted operational assistance and topic-wide suspicion.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-007", "marker": "7", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-005", "article_path": "/articles/safety-without-surveillance", "passage_anchor": "collect-less", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/safety-without-surveillance#collect-less", "role": "Evidence linkage", "statement": "Some safety outcomes can be pursued while retaining less or no centralized raw inquiry history.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-014" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-028", "QAEDA-SRC-033" ], "editorial_note": "The claim is architectural possibility, not a claim that every safety function can be decentralized or made zero-knowledge.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-008", "marker": "8", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-005", "article_path": "/articles/safety-without-surveillance", "passage_anchor": "identity-minimization", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/safety-without-surveillance#identity-minimization", "role": "Evidence linkage", "statement": "Services can sometimes verify a needed attribute without collecting a full identity dossier.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-019" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-024", "QAEDA-SRC-028", "QAEDA-SRC-033" ], "editorial_note": "Applicability depends on the eligibility problem, threat model, and credential architecture.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-009", "marker": "9", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-006", "article_path": "/articles/safety-poison-pill-narrowed", "passage_anchor": "narrowed-thesis", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/safety-poison-pill-narrowed#narrowed-thesis", "role": "Correction / qualification", "statement": "The safety-poison-pill thesis survives only in narrowed form: function creep and chilling effects are risks, not proof that all safety controls are surveillance.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-015", "QAEDA-CLM-016" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-029", "QAEDA-SRC-032", "QAEDA-SRC-033" ], "editorial_note": "This annotation preserves the adversarial report’s correction instead of retaining the stronger rhetoric.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-010", "marker": "10", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-007", "article_path": "/articles/expansion-ratchet", "passage_anchor": "risk-not-inevitability", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/expansion-ratchet#risk-not-inevitability", "role": "Correction / qualification", "statement": "Exceptional powers can expand beyond their original purpose, but persistence and expansion are not inevitable.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-015" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-027", "QAEDA-SRC-032", "QAEDA-SRC-033" ], "editorial_note": "Rollback, sunsets, deletion, and institutional reform are part of the historical record too.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-011", "marker": "11", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-008", "article_path": "/articles/cognitive-liberty-for-minors", "passage_anchor": "pull-vs-push", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/cognitive-liberty-for-minors#pull-vs-push", "role": "Editorial synthesis", "statement": "Deliberate information seeking and manipulative push-based amplification are different governance problems.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-017" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-024", "QAEDA-SRC-033" ], "editorial_note": "QAEDA uses this distinction to protect developing autonomy while allowing stronger safeguards against exploitative recommender design.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-012", "marker": "12", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-008", "article_path": "/articles/cognitive-liberty-for-minors", "passage_anchor": "age-not-identity", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/cognitive-liberty-for-minors#age-not-identity", "role": "Evidence linkage", "statement": "Age-threshold checks need not always disclose a complete real-world identity to the relying service.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-019" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-024", "QAEDA-SRC-028", "QAEDA-SRC-033" ], "editorial_note": "This does not imply one credential design works for every jurisdiction or risk level.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-013", "marker": "13", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-009", "article_path": "/articles/audit-the-gatekeeper", "passage_anchor": "ten-dimensions", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/audit-the-gatekeeper#ten-dimensions", "role": "Verified project fact", "statement": "The QAEDA Cognitive Liberty Audit defines ten separate categories rather than one ideology score.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-018" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-022" ], "editorial_note": "This is a verifiable description of QAEDA’s published experimental framework, not external certification.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-014", "marker": "14", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-009", "article_path": "/articles/audit-the-gatekeeper", "passage_anchor": "auditability-liberty", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/audit-the-gatekeeper#auditability-liberty", "role": "Governance inference", "statement": "Transparent reasons and meaningful recourse make consequential automated power more contestable.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-020" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-020", "QAEDA-SRC-022" ], "editorial_note": "The claim is procedural: transparency does not guarantee correctness, but opacity removes an important correction mechanism.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-015", "marker": "15", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-011", "article_path": "/articles/rebel-or-die-provenance", "passage_anchor": "smedley-layers", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/rebel-or-die-provenance#smedley-layers", "role": "Provenance qualification", "statement": "The shorter Smedley attribution and the longer two-clause wording have different evidentiary status.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-003", "QAEDA-CLM-004" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-012", "QAEDA-SRC-014" ], "editorial_note": "The shorter form has a credible secondary attribution; the added sentence remains unverified as Smedley wording in the reviewed corpus.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-016", "marker": "16", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-011", "article_path": "/articles/rebel-or-die-provenance", "passage_anchor": "russian-slogan", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/rebel-or-die-provenance#russian-slogan", "role": "Provenance correction", "statement": "“Rebel or Die” is not verified as a canonical movement-level slogan of post-2022 Russian anti-war resistance.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-002" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-008", "QAEDA-SRC-012", "QAEDA-SRC-016", "QAEDA-SRC-017" ], "editorial_note": "The negative finding means no verifiable movement-level provenance was located; it does not prove no individual ever used similar wording.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-017", "marker": "17", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-012", "article_path": "/articles/russian-anti-war-language", "passage_anchor": "no-to-war", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/russian-anti-war-language#no-to-war", "role": "Verified provenance", "statement": "“Нет войне!” (“No to war!”) has a dense dated documentary trail from 24 February 2022 onward.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-001" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-008", "QAEDA-SRC-009", "QAEDA-SRC-010" ], "editorial_note": "This is the stronger historical anchor for the public essay’s account of Russian anti-war language.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-018", "marker": "18", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-012", "article_path": "/articles/russian-anti-war-language", "passage_anchor": "heterogeneous-resistance", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/russian-anti-war-language#heterogeneous-resistance", "role": "Evidence linkage", "statement": "Russian resistance to the war and mobilization was heterogeneous rather than one unified movement.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-005" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-009", "QAEDA-SRC-010", "QAEDA-SRC-015" ], "editorial_note": "The source set distinguishes protest, exit, legal avoidance, conscientious objection, family activism, refusal, and a smaller destructive fringe.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-019", "marker": "19", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-013", "article_path": "/articles/orange-revelation-epistemic-hygiene", "passage_anchor": "exact-reconstruction", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/orange-revelation-epistemic-hygiene#exact-reconstruction", "role": "Verified textual fact", "statement": "Removing the inserted token and joining “reve” + “lation” reconstructs “revelation” without changing a letter.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-007" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-011", "QAEDA-SRC-013" ], "editorial_note": "This establishes the string reconstruction, not the identity of the referent.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-020", "marker": "20", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-013", "article_path": "/articles/orange-revelation-epistemic-hygiene", "passage_anchor": "fake-unity", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/orange-revelation-epistemic-hygiene#fake-unity", "role": "Provenance qualification", "statement": "Search adjacency among unrelated “Orange Revelation” uses does not establish one transmitted cross-domain concept.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-008" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-011", "QAEDA-SRC-013" ], "editorial_note": "One source deliberately explores an interdisciplinary motif; the source-critical report shows why that metaphor should not be mistaken for historical transmission.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-021", "marker": "21", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-022", "article_path": "/articles/censorship-beyond-the-ban", "passage_anchor": "visibility-without-deletion", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/censorship-beyond-the-ban#visibility-without-deletion", "role": "Evidence linkage", "statement": "A visibility system can materially restrict discoverability without deleting the source artifact.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-021" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-060", "QAEDA-SRC-061" ], "editorial_note": "The source corpus supports the mechanism distinction; it does not prove that every ranking loss is deliberate censorship.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-022", "marker": "22", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-023", "article_path": "/articles/right-to-read-privately", "passage_anchor": "private-reception", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/right-to-read-privately#private-reception", "role": "Normative synthesis", "statement": "Private reception is upstream of public expression and can be chilled by identity-linked surveillance.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-023", "QAEDA-CLM-012" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-040", "QAEDA-SRC-062", "QAEDA-SRC-054" ], "editorial_note": "The principle is stronger than any single legal doctrine; targeted process and necessary identity-dependent transactions remain distinct cases.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-023", "marker": "23", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-024", "article_path": "/articles/censorship-drift-democracies", "passage_anchor": "drift-not-destiny", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/censorship-drift-democracies#drift-not-destiny", "role": "Adversarial qualification", "statement": "Censorship drift is a recurring institutional risk, not an inevitable outcome of every safety rule.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-024", "QAEDA-CLM-015" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-047", "QAEDA-SRC-051", "QAEDA-SRC-052", "QAEDA-SRC-039" ], "editorial_note": "The source set contains both warning mechanisms and legitimate restriction frameworks; QAEDA rejects inevitability rhetoric.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-024", "marker": "24", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-025", "article_path": "/articles/memory-needs-many-custodians", "passage_anchor": "plural-custody", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/memory-needs-many-custodians#plural-custody", "role": "Evidence linkage", "statement": "Independent redundant custody reduces single-point erasure risk for important records.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-026", "QAEDA-CLM-035" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-034", "QAEDA-SRC-046", "QAEDA-SRC-049" ], "editorial_note": "Redundancy improves resilience but does not remove authenticity, privacy, copyright, or safety obligations.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-025", "marker": "25", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-026", "article_path": "/articles/financial-chokepoints-speech", "passage_anchor": "money-as-chokepoint", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/financial-chokepoints-speech#money-as-chokepoint", "role": "Structural evidence", "statement": "Financial intermediaries can materially constrain lawful speakers even when they do not remove the speech itself.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-027", "QAEDA-CLM-022" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-035", "QAEDA-SRC-037", "QAEDA-SRC-061" ], "editorial_note": "Commercial enforcement is not automatically equivalent to state censorship; actor, coercion, alternatives, and due process matter.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-026", "marker": "26", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-027", "article_path": "/articles/language-as-information-border", "passage_anchor": "translation-is-not-neutral", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/language-as-information-border#translation-is-not-neutral", "role": "Evidence linkage", "statement": "Translation, omission, and controlled vocabulary can create different informational worlds across languages.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-028" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-036", "QAEDA-SRC-059", "QAEDA-SRC-041" ], "editorial_note": "Specific translation claims require source-text comparison; ordinary linguistic ambiguity should not be mislabeled as censorship.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-027", "marker": "27", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-028", "article_path": "/articles/personalized-censorship", "passage_anchor": "differential-visibility", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/personalized-censorship#differential-visibility", "role": "Capability qualification", "statement": "Personalized systems can create user-specific visibility boundaries, but capability alone does not prove intentional personalized censorship.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-029", "QAEDA-CLM-030" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-064", "QAEDA-SRC-060", "QAEDA-SRC-065", "QAEDA-SRC-058" ], "editorial_note": "Controlled comparative evidence is required before attributing motive or viewpoint discrimination to a particular provider.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-028", "marker": "28", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-029", "article_path": "/articles/identity-before-expression", "passage_anchor": "attribute-not-dossier", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/identity-before-expression#attribute-not-dossier", "role": "Design evidence", "statement": "Some eligibility checks can disclose an attribute without disclosing a full identity dossier.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-031", "QAEDA-CLM-019" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-043", "QAEDA-SRC-058" ], "editorial_note": "This is an architectural possibility, not a claim that every jurisdiction or service can safely eliminate identity requirements.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-029", "marker": "29", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-030", "article_path": "/articles/resilience-without-new-gatekeeper", "passage_anchor": "layered-resilience", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/resilience-without-new-gatekeeper#layered-resilience", "role": "Synthesis", "statement": "Information resilience is stronger when it is layered across custody, protocols, access routes, and privacy rather than concentrated in one gatekeeper.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-032", "QAEDA-CLM-026" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-038", "QAEDA-SRC-057", "QAEDA-SRC-034", "QAEDA-SRC-044" ], "editorial_note": "The report bodies include technical circumvention detail; public synthesis intentionally stays at the architecture/governance level.", "updated": "2026-09-02" }, { "id": "QAEDA-ANN-030", "marker": "30", "article_id": "QAEDA-ART-031", "article_path": "/articles/russia-information-control-stack", "passage_anchor": "multi-layer-stack", "passage_url": "https://qaeda.org/articles/russia-information-control-stack#multi-layer-stack", "role": "Current-source qualification", "statement": "The Russian model described by the source corpus combines legal, network, platform, surveillance, and punitive layers rather than one firewall.", "claim_ids": [ "QAEDA-CLM-033", "QAEDA-CLM-034" ], "source_ids": [ "QAEDA-SRC-050", "QAEDA-SRC-045", "QAEDA-SRC-056", "QAEDA-SRC-055" ], "editorial_note": "Current details are time-sensitive and should be freshly verified before being treated as a present-tense implementation inventory.", "updated": "2026-09-02" } ], "related": { "claims": "https://qaeda.org/claims.json", "evidence": "https://qaeda.org/evidence-map.json", "citations": "https://qaeda.org/citations.json" } }