Request interpretation can become persistent profiling when query context is joined to broader user history.
This note distinguishes immediate relevance inference from durable cross-request person models.
Provenance at the point of reading
Consequential statements can be traced directly to the public claim ledger and preserved source identifiers—without publishing protected dossier bodies or pretending every sentence has the same evidentiary status.
Request interpretation can become persistent profiling when query context is joined to broader user history.
This note distinguishes immediate relevance inference from durable cross-request person models.
Consequential ranking, refusal, sanction, or risk classification should expose reasons and meaningful correction paths.
This is QAEDA’s governance inference from due-process and auditability research; it is not a claim that every ranking decision requires formal adjudication.
A marker does not certify the sentence. It records why the passage is consequential, which claim status governs it, which preserved dossiers inform it, and what qualification should travel with the prose.