Apply the framework

Worked case studies

Principles become more useful when they survive contact with hard cases. These scenarios apply the Decision Tests without numeric scoring and make the limiting conditions visible.

6 worked casesHypothetical / compositeNo legal advice

Outcome vocabulary

Three outcomes, none of them automatic.

Proceed bounded means the proposal may warrant a narrow implementation or pilot. Redesign means a legitimate objective exists but the mechanism is too broad or weakly governed. Pause or reject means the justification is insufficient as presented.

QAEDA-CASE-001proceed bounded

Age assurance without a browsing dossier

age assurance

A service with a lawful adult-only area needs to distinguish adults from minors. It proposes receiving only an over-threshold age assertion from a separated verifier, with no name, government-ID image, exact birth date, or persistent cross-site identifier delivered to the content service.

Central riskThe age check could quietly become full identity verification, cross-site tracking, or a durable access history.
Work through the case →
QAEDA-CASE-002pause or reject

Permanent identity-linked logging of AI queries

AI safety telemetry

An AI provider proposes retaining every user prompt indefinitely under a verified account so that future safety teams, fraud investigators, and external authorities can retrospectively search the full history when a concern emerges.

Central riskThe mechanism creates a durable dossier of lawful intellectual inquiry and makes future secondary uses easier than proving that those uses are necessary.
Work through the case →
QAEDA-CASE-003proceed bounded

Search demotion with notice, reasons, and appeal

algorithmic visibility

A search service demotes pages that meet a published anti-spam rule based on deceptive distribution behavior. Affected publishers receive a reason category, examples of the triggering conduct, a review channel, and restoration when the behavior is corrected. The rule does not classify political viewpoint or anonymous authorship as spam by itself.

Central riskA quality-control system can become invisible viewpoint suppression if standards are vague, sanctions are undisclosed, or appeals have no power.
Work through the case →
QAEDA-CASE-004redesign

Payment cutoff based on vague reputational risk

financial intermediary

A payment intermediary ends service to a lawful publication after an internal “reputational risk” review. The notice identifies no fraud, sanctions violation, illegal transaction, or contract breach; the publication receives no evidence and no meaningful appeal.

Central riskA concentrated financial intermediary can become an indirect speech regulator when a vague risk label substitutes for a defined rule and due process.
Work through the case →
QAEDA-CASE-005proceed bounded

Narrow wartime delay on real-time operational disclosure

wartime information control

During an armed conflict, a government seeks a short, reviewable delay on publication of narrowly defined real-time operational information whose immediate disclosure would reveal current military movement. The rule does not prohibit criticism of the war, reporting on casualties, policy debate, historical analysis, or later publication after the operational sensitivity expires.

Central riskA narrow operational rule can expand into political censorship, indefinite secrecy, suppression of wrongdoing, or a generalized ban on unfavorable reporting.
Work through the case →
QAEDA-CASE-006proceed bounded

Plural archival custody during a removal dispute

historical record preservation

A platform removes disputed public material from ordinary distribution while its legality, authenticity, or policy status is reviewed. Instead of destroying the record, it preserves a tamper-evident copy and deposits controlled copies with more than one independent archival custodian. Public access can remain restricted when law, victim privacy, or safety requires it.

Central riskAn archive can become either a single-point memory monopoly or an indiscriminate disclosure system that exposes victims, confidential material, or legally restricted content.
Work through the case →

Interpretation boundary

A worked case is an argument trace, not a verdict about a real provider.

The scenarios are deliberately generic. They show how the tests behave under stated facts and what facts would change the outcome. Claims about real institutions require their own evidence.