Some safety outcomes can be pursued while retaining less or no centralized raw inquiry history.
The claim is architectural possibility, not a claim that every safety function can be decentralized or made zero-knowledge.
Provenance at the point of reading
Consequential statements can be traced directly to the public claim ledger and preserved source identifiers—without publishing protected dossier bodies or pretending every sentence has the same evidentiary status.
Some safety outcomes can be pursued while retaining less or no centralized raw inquiry history.
The claim is architectural possibility, not a claim that every safety function can be decentralized or made zero-knowledge.
Services can sometimes verify a needed attribute without collecting a full identity dossier.
Applicability depends on the eligibility problem, threat model, and credential architecture.
A marker does not certify the sentence. It records why the passage is consequential, which claim status governs it, which preserved dossiers inform it, and what qualification should travel with the prose.