The QAEDA Cognitive Liberty Audit defines ten separate categories rather than one ideology score.
This is a verifiable description of QAEDA’s published experimental framework, not external certification.
Provenance at the point of reading
Consequential statements can be traced directly to the public claim ledger and preserved source identifiers—without publishing protected dossier bodies or pretending every sentence has the same evidentiary status.
The QAEDA Cognitive Liberty Audit defines ten separate categories rather than one ideology score.
This is a verifiable description of QAEDA’s published experimental framework, not external certification.
Transparent reasons and meaningful recourse make consequential automated power more contestable.
The claim is procedural: transparency does not guarantee correctness, but opacity removes an important correction mechanism.
A marker does not certify the sentence. It records why the passage is consequential, which claim status governs it, which preserved dossiers inform it, and what qualification should travel with the prose.