Removing the inserted token and joining “reve” + “lation” reconstructs “revelation” without changing a letter.
This establishes the string reconstruction, not the identity of the referent.
Provenance at the point of reading
Consequential statements can be traced directly to the public claim ledger and preserved source identifiers—without publishing protected dossier bodies or pretending every sentence has the same evidentiary status.
Removing the inserted token and joining “reve” + “lation” reconstructs “revelation” without changing a letter.
This establishes the string reconstruction, not the identity of the referent.
Search adjacency among unrelated “Orange Revelation” uses does not establish one transmitted cross-domain concept.
One source deliberately explores an interdisciplinary motif; the source-critical report shows why that metaphor should not be mistaken for historical transmission.
A marker does not certify the sentence. It records why the passage is consequential, which claim status governs it, which preserved dossiers inform it, and what qualification should travel with the prose.