Censorship drift is a recurring institutional risk, not an inevitable outcome of every safety rule.
The source set contains both warning mechanisms and legitimate restriction frameworks; QAEDA rejects inevitability rhetoric.
Provenance at the point of reading
Consequential statements can be traced directly to the public claim ledger and preserved source identifiers—without publishing protected dossier bodies or pretending every sentence has the same evidentiary status.
Censorship drift is a recurring institutional risk, not an inevitable outcome of every safety rule.
The source set contains both warning mechanisms and legitimate restriction frameworks; QAEDA rejects inevitability rhetoric.
A marker does not certify the sentence. It records why the passage is consequential, which claim status governs it, which preserved dossiers inform it, and what qualification should travel with the prose.