Translation, omission, and controlled vocabulary can create different informational worlds across languages.
Specific translation claims require source-text comparison; ordinary linguistic ambiguity should not be mislabeled as censorship.
Provenance at the point of reading
Consequential statements can be traced directly to the public claim ledger and preserved source identifiers—without publishing protected dossier bodies or pretending every sentence has the same evidentiary status.
Translation, omission, and controlled vocabulary can create different informational worlds across languages.
Specific translation claims require source-text comparison; ordinary linguistic ambiguity should not be mislabeled as censorship.
A marker does not certify the sentence. It records why the passage is consequential, which claim status governs it, which preserved dossiers inform it, and what qualification should travel with the prose.