Provenance at the point of reading
Consequential statements can be traced directly to the public claim ledger and preserved source identifiers—without publishing protected dossier bodies or pretending every sentence has the same evidentiary status.
Personalized systems can create user-specific visibility boundaries, but capability alone does not prove intentional personalized censorship.
Controlled comparative evidence is required before attributing motive or viewpoint discrimination to a particular provider.
A marker does not certify the sentence. It records why the passage is consequential, which claim status governs it, which preserved dossiers inform it, and what qualification should travel with the prose.